![]() Rather than wanting to be the only tool you ever need for every situation, it wants to cover all the basics of orchestral writing in an approachable fashion. Spitfire BBC SO was designed as a 'universal starting point', as they call it. ![]() That makes it flexible, but it can also be confusing. Hollywood Orchestra was designed as a be all end all orchestral sample library. It will be more limiting for solistic or virtuosic writing though.Īpart from the differences in the sound signature, another important point to consider is the background of these libraries. It sounds very cohesive as an ensemble, like no other library I know of. ![]() Spitfire BBC Symphonic Orchestra is a bit more neutral/versatile. As the title suggest, think of Hollywood movies intended for the large screen. What kind of music do you want to write? Generally speaking Eastwest Hollywood Orchestra is ideal for a sweeping widescreen type of sound. So these “what’s the best….” or “which one is better” questions are rather useless at the end of the day, I’m sorry to say. I have and like both, but they’re like night and day apart. Core may be an option when you’re looking for a mobile solution.Ħ) Personal preferences. Some people are experiencing issues with OPUS (the player) and others have issues with BBCSO (inconsistent shorts).ĥ) Storage requirements. So always wait for a sale.Ĥ) Quality control. BBCSO Core is already more expensive, and eventually you are going to want (need) Pro, which is even more expensive. ![]() HOPUS is currently $354 over at JRRshop with coupon GROUP. Read up on user experiences for each one. 1) HOPUS as the name suggests aims for a Hollywood sound, BBCSO aims for the symphonic orchestra sound.Ģ) The OPUS player versus the Spitfire player. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |